View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Christopher Carnley
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 Posts: 2746 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:10 am Post subject: Walter Presents |
|
|
Another thrilling episode of "Walter Presents".
Lagonda LG45 Rapide with the WO breathed on Sanction 111 engine and the horrible to work on G(Good) 10 gearbox.
From a private collection. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Robins
Joined: 01 Jan 1985 Posts: 1208 Location: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Unfiltered air intakes always cause a sharp intake of breath,if you'll excuse the bad joke. Looking at the grubby state of the roads these days, if this car was to do much road work, I think at least a pair of pancake filters might be a good idea. They appear to be taking care of muck in the petrol, what about the muck in the air? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert Craven
Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 554 Location: Swansea, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think I can see there are some kind of basic mesh filters on this car, can't I?
Many, if not most, WOs (including mine) don't have air filters, but partly because there isn't much room. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Christopher Carnley
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 Posts: 2746 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, a grille for lumps, but is that the only observation?
It is taking a trip to Spain in the Spring, so I did mention the lack of air filtration. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Robins
Joined: 01 Jan 1985 Posts: 1208 Location: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another observation?
The short piece of flexible petrol pipe between the pump and the carbs looked a bit inadequate to cope with engine movement to me, but then it occurred that the engine is probably not as flexibly mounted as these days. Why the twin feeds to the filter? Two tanks? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Christopher Carnley
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 Posts: 2746 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The car may have a change over to reserve. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Brotton
Joined: 04 Nov 2024 Posts: 18 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just a thought ? Would the carbs work better with just a short ....even a 2" air trumpet would improve air flow ? From experience with Jaguar engines, leaving carbs without a plenum chamber, or open as per photo, has a direct effect on running, and power loss is quite noticeable. A fine mesh between the trumpet and carb would stop a pebble bouncing in anyway. On a scale of 1 to 10, how big a mess could that make ?....I guess 'originality' is OK, but.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Christopher Carnley
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 Posts: 2746 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I,ve never seen any prewar Lagonda engine with a venturi, if you look you will notice that the inlet manifold is integral with the cylinder head in the Sanction 3 engines, designed by Harry Weslake, after the 2 failed to reach power output expectations.
Much to the consternation of WO, when the Sanction 3 was struggling, the workers discovered that the exhaust from the test bed was choked with soot!
All these moans and no one has said "what a nice car", you all remind me of the trainee Trappist monk........... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Robins
Joined: 01 Jan 1985 Posts: 1208 Location: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did think it, but don't like using the word nice. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Brotton
Joined: 04 Nov 2024 Posts: 18 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Beautiful car ! I just don't like stating the obvious !
Where does the Trapist monk come into this ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Robins
Joined: 01 Jan 1985 Posts: 1208 Location: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He didn't say. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Murch

Joined: 05 Jun 1976 Posts: 1567 Location: London, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Christopher Carnley wrote: |
All these moans and no one has said "what a nice car",... |
Looking very stylish, I had one of these about 20 years ago, I much prefered driving the 3ltr! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert Zannetti Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vaguely similar?
[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Christopher Carnley
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 Posts: 2746 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Originally B234GA a 1936 Park Ward saloon, it reputedly is fitted with a 7100 cc engine (Phantom3?).
Do you have any further information on this car, Robert? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert Zannetti Guest
|
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I saw the car in this country and it is in storage for the owner who lives on the Continent. The body is by Peterson Engineering and was built in, circa, 2010. The engine is a Rolls Royce B81SV 6.5 litre straight eight. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Christopher Carnley
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 Posts: 2746 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Robert, it seems odd to me that "engineers" install grossly over-sized engines into feeble frames. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|